I had an instructor in college years ago say that a resume longer than two pages was unprofessional and would be ignored. Most 21 year old students didn’t have enough experiences to fill one page so that wasn’t really a problem for most of us.
There were other rules, too, like margin sizes, typeface styles, appropriate business grammar and so on. Much of that has changed with the new technologies, social networking and the way in which we apply for jobs. But one small fundamental has not. This critical element is so powerful, so essential that not tending to it can have a staggering impact on a job search. This one old trick, if used with rigidity and regularity when drafting a resume will certainly increase its odds of not getting tossed into the reject pile.
Ready for this tip, this must-do pearl of wisdom?
Use your spell checker.
Yes, that’s it. That is the weird old tip.
I read dozens of resumes each week and have for over fifteen years. Most seasoned recruiters will tell you that the typos in resumes are a primary reason the resume is not routed. Recruiters and hiring managers are easily off-put by sloppy resumes. A person who won’t take the time to do something as elementary as push a spell-check key may not be mindful of details on the job.
Your resume is you. It is your representative. It speaks for you. Every word should be scrutinized. Every piece of punctuation should be reviewed. After you’ve completed your draft, run spell-check a few times, pass the resume to others to review. Seek out their comments. You cannot edit or review a resume enough.
Sometimes the most minor thing can make the biggest difference in getting your resume to the next step.
Despite the various bursting bubbles, financial flame-outs and blood-curdling recessions, the challenges for employers seem to have stayed the same. They want a flexible job force that needs little training, adjusts well and requires moderate monitoring or mentoring. These same employers bemoan the availability of quality candidates for their job openings. Yet there is a wellspring of overlooked talent that does exist and can quickly and easily fill this void. It is often segregated and overlooked because of marketplace misconceptions and myths. It is the mid-career or older worker.
Although age discrimination is illegal it most certainly exists and appears more prevalent than gender or race discrimination. In many markets it is overwhelmingly apparent, such as the film and television industries. In others it can be more covert but it is still just as real.
Ask anybody on the job hunt age fifty or over and they can attest to the challenges of even getting a phone interview when just a few short years before the problem was deciding which call to take. Those fortunate enough to be screened cite the same feedback when turned down for a role:
- Another candidate whose “skills more closely matched” the needs of the company was identified
- Or, the candidate themselves was “too qualified”
While the first is open to interpretation and might indeed reflect a core competency reality, the second is almost without question derived from an observation of the applicant’s age and the underlying preconceived notions related to workforce longevity stereotypes.
What are these myths that are so prevalent with recruiters and hiring authorities? The stereotype breaks down into four areas. Those fifty years of age and older are:
- Too expensive
- Lower energy employees
- Not as technically savvy
Reality is much different. Studies have shown that those over fifty:
- Have broader knowledge and better work performance. (Research has found no relationship between job performance and an employee’s age.)
- Are happier and have better interpersonal skills
- Quit less, use far less sick days and have less accidents
- Are more flexible in their work schedules
- Cost less: The market dictates salaries based on experience, not age. While health care use is greater, they typically don’t have dependents to pay for and don’t contend with pregnancies or childcare issues, so there is a strong offset.
So what do we do?
The workforce is rapidly aging. By 2020 those fifty-five and older will make up almost 40% of the employed. There will be less young workers joining the ranks. Employers will be forced to confront the ageism issue head-on. But this can be a huge win for all parties. The solution starts with the employer.
- Educate young supervisors regarding the stereotypes of the older worker. Begin dispelling these misconceptions. Help them to be empowered as managers.
- Teach young supervisors how to give feedback and guidance and how to hold older workers accountable.
- Create a culture that embraces those in mid-career (just as some companies have outreach programs for military veterans). Establish benefits and rewards that are relevant to the older worker, these typically are not pay and promotions.
What can a fifty-year old out of work do to help themselves get hired?
- Push back against the stereotypes, but don’t overdo it.
- Build a resume that reflects the high accomplishments of the past fifteen years at the most. Ten is better, especially in the tech fields. Anything beyond that starts to ‘age’ a resume and a prospective employee. Emphasize your problem solving ability, people skills, leadership experiences and examples of sound judgment.
- Be sure to enroll in continuing education courses and certification programs – especially in the technical fields – that show an on-going interest in career development and progression.
- Get active in career affinity groups in person and online. Become visible and vocal.
- Get in shape and maintain a healthy diet. The younger you feel the younger people will feel you are. Age isn’t all about days on a calendar.
And a final word to the prospective employee, don’t pre-judge the employers. Your wisdom comes from your experience and your experience has value. The young hiring manager will see that if you present yourself respectfully. You may well be the answer to their workforce problem.
“Ah, Go Bing Yourself…”
I’ll wait. Go to www.bing.com and search for own name. Now do the same at Google.com. Try your name and job title together. Check out your images on Google.
Surprised at what you found? Almost everybody has some searchable information available with just a few clicks. First impressions are everything. Honestly ask yourself what people would think of you if all they had were these data points?
Recruiters, hiring managers and interviewers frequently use this information to “learn” about candidates. They will search using your email address, too. Employers will know a lot about us long before we ever hear from them – if we ever hear from them.
With the resume in the death-rattle stage of its existence, the online profile and other information have become the basis for making next-step recruiting decisions. A person with generous praise in a Linkedin profile as well as a few self-written blog postings related to some aspect of their career may well get plucked from the digital swirl and asked to interview over someone whose online life is only represented by book recommendations and a simple chronological profile on a job social network.
So, to improve your odds of getting the call or email or response regarding a job opportunity, control what you can online. At a minimum review your Linkedin profile every few months and keep it current (do not overdo the recommendation piece… too many can be perceived as desperate or hiding something…) Be sure you have a photo on Linkedin. A good quality image works best. Reply to questions people post on Linkedin or ask your own. Keeps you visible. Make sure that the keywords relevant to your career are in your profile and position summaries.
More importantly, if you can write clearly, make an effort to respond to blog postings in your career niche or write a couple guest blogs. Set up a WordPress blog of your own – about you — and make sure your resume is available for download. Review relevant work related books on Amazon.com. Post photos on Instagram — helps tell a bit about who you are versus “what” you are work-wise. Join Meetup.com and find a career or business group near you that shares your interests. Tweet a bit. Make sure your actual resume is current on The Ladders or Monster.com or any career site you use. Recruiters will still ask for and review them, but usually after they’ve already found you. All of this will add to your online image and helps you control the initial impressions about you.
Keeping your online brand fresh is not that hard. Just takes a little effort and the results can be quite positive. Neglecting your online presence can be equally detrimental.
My buddy likes to tell the story about the candidate that showed up for an interview wearing a droopy fishnet sleeveless t-shirt, a pair of well worn running shorts and dusty sandals. Not bad attire for a beach volleyball game, but not so much for a software engineer interview. Somehow, some way, the candidate came to believe this was acceptable haute couture to his potential new employer.
In many minds corporate culture extends only to things like core business hours and casual dress. The reality is corporate culture is hard to truly define and encompasses shared values, traditions, customs, beliefs and policies. As a foundation these work to cultivate and grow what we call corporate culture. Word of our culture creeps into the street with every e-mail we write to a prospective candidate, every phone screen we perform to ascertain qualifications, every face-to-face interview, every reference check and every follow-up thereafter. What we say, when we say it, what we do, how we do it all reflects that culture back to the world outside and to those unfound gems we will someday seek to hire. Their impressions become the word on the street. Their treatment and candidate experience spreads the cultural lore, good or bad and builds our recruiting brand.
Recruiter contact often creates that first impression – the first peek into corporate culture – that a candidate will have of a company, especially for a start-up or little known business. It’s easy to leverage the name Starbucks or Microsoft to reach a passive candidate, those companies have defined goods and legendary cultures, but it’s another to try and entice somebody to talk to a new company with little track record. Long before any overture is made to bring somebody into an organization, clear thought and planning needs to be put into candidate communication and how to properly present the company. Anybody involved in the recruiting process needs to understand the importance of this messaging. The theme and thread of corporate culture needs to be woven in each aspect of the recruiting cycle.
Mr. Fishnet may very well have been the gem in the rough, the genius the company had been looking for to solve a major issue or build the next big thing. A clarification from the recruiter beforehand about corporate expectations on interview days – part of communicating the culture – could have easily prevented this awkward yet memorable moment.
I once consulted for an early-stage company CEO who loved negotiating salary deals with new hires. No matter what salary compromise or offer I suggested to him he would demand I go back to the candidate and offer much less – even when he truly wanted and needed the employee and could afford what they asked. It was about power and winning. He saw squeezing a dime and getting the candidate to bend as a way to show his authority early. What he was really doing was breeding contempt not only for him but for his company’s image in the marketplace. Turn-over was high and an expensive drain on his resources and he couldn’t understand why. He was a decent man and fun person to be around, but this management tick almost derailed him.
One morning he said to me, “I love tough economies and recessions. There are usually lots of bodies in the water.” He was, of course, referring to the unemployed. He saw this pool (pun intended) of bodies as a desperate bunch who would take nickels on the dollar to come work for him. It just doesn’t happen that way. Here is why: The assumption made is that the skill set being sought happens to belong to a member of the unemployed ranks. Worse yet, the assumption is that the IDEAL person is among the unemployed and needing of a job. Here is the reality: During economic downturns people tend to cautiously stay put if employed and will wait out the economic storm. When good times return the exodus can be pretty high of employees who felt underpaid or taken advantage of. The disenfranchised become highly recruitable. It is happening right now in our Seattle market.
My caution to clients is always the same – don’t generalize during good or bad markets – there may be a large pool of unemployed, but they may not be of the right fit for the given openings. Accept that recruiting the right person takes planning and a deliberate process and investment. Spend the time and energy to find and hire the best person for the job instead of trusting the winds of economic change to send along the dream candidate at a cut-throat salary.
A few years ago I was interviewing for a recruiter position when I was asked:
“What innovative things have you done to find candidates?”
I smiled and politely answered, “I try to kill werewolves.”
My point was simple: Recruiters and their employers are constantly on the lookout for a silver bullet that will magically end the monster madness associated with finding the right candidate for a critical needs position, in a timely fashion, under budgetary constraints.
I maintained then as I do now that a highly skilled and experienced recruiter is the closest remedy for that challenge. Technical innovations, while helpful in identifying prospects, will never solve the problem. A good, experienced recruiter is the silver bullet.
Even with the advent of social networks, job boards, tweets, on-line affinity groups and forums, somebody has to source, screen and vet a prospect and qualify them for a position. The problem today is the unwieldy amount of resume-type data available for review. Time was a recruiter tracked down candidates through pro-active research and phone calls. Now the struggle is digging a qualified candidate out of a mire of data muck shoveled in from countless sources. Candidates, too, are inundated with digital overtures that are routed to spam folders without so much as a peek. I was recently recruited via email for a scrub nurse position – I have no medical background – but was a perfect “word match” determined by some boolean search tool and approached with little human intervention. This automated reliance just feeds the monster, alienates candidates and compromises the hiring experience. All the recruiting investment and technical innovation goes to waste at this point.
So, how can a company succeed and compete effectively for new employees? The ageless secret solution to taming the recruiting beast really is the same as it has always been – invest in a good recruiter who can build and maintain process. Hire a recruiter who has a myriad of real world business experience and proven successes. Hire a recruiter who can communicate clearly, efficiently and honesty in writing and who isn’t afraid of the phone. Hire a recruiter who is not dependent or content with simply mining an inbox for possible candidates from data feeds. Hire a recruiter who is a consultant to his employer and to the candidate. If a company does that, they will have found the secret weapon to recruiting woes…a werewolf killer.
Oh, and by the way, I was offered the job for which I was interviewing because of my “creative answers”.
“The woman interviewing me fell asleep.”
I usually spend the last twenty minutes of a candidate’s interview day with them in sort of a mini debriefing and expectation setting exercise. One of my standard questions is to ask how each interviewer interacted with the candidate and how did the candidate feel about them. This helps me to help the interviewer if there are any recurring issues. One particular candidate told me, as the quote above says, that the interviewer nodded off near the end of the interview. I wasn’t sure whether that was a reflection on the interviewer or a reaction to the candidate’s monotone vocal style. Regardless, it wasn’t exactly the best candidate experience one would want to have.
Having interviewed hundreds and hundreds of candidates, I’ve heard and seen some interesting and annoying things in an interview room. There was the candidate who cleaned out her purse while being questioned; the guy who ate sunflower seeds and spit husks into a coffee cup; the loud talker who insisted on showing me all of his awards going back to junior high – he’d brought them with him (in fairness, he did have two patents in there as well). This list could go on and on about candidates, but what of interviewers and naps?
Every person interviewing a candidate IS the company for those fleeting moments. The candidate is listening to everything, watching, assessing, judging and building an impression. It really is a two-way experience. An interviewer who displays a lack of attention is telling the candidate they don’t matter. An interviewer who reviews emails, cleans their nails, checks their iPhone or takes a call while a candidate answers questions is marginalizing the candidate and compromising what should be a healthy and valuable experience.
To get the best out of an interview, write out key questions ahead of time (behavioral based is best), keep them to one sheet. Bring a pad and pen to capture relevant points AFTER the candidate has answered the question. Scribbling during an answer can often dictate the direction of the answer in real-time if the candidate perceives they are saying something powerful – right or wrong. Leave the laptop, iPhone and any other possible intrusive device in your office. It’s not the end of the world to disconnect for thirty or forty minutes. Bring coffee or ice water with you if you are groggy. Let the candidate know you are interested in them by how you act. Focus; summarize answers out loud so the candidate knows they were understood; let the candidate do most of the talking. The impression set and the experience had will then be positive and relevant for both participants of the interview.
Turns out the napping interviewer really did fall asleep, but had startled themselves awake when the candidate quit talking. Going forward I had that interviewer pair up with another from their team and interview candidates together. Worked like a dream.